↓ Archives ↓

Archive → August, 2008

August 30th, 2008

The Kindness of Strangers

The Marrying Kind movement — a boycott of the marriage economy– is in its infancy. The boycott will continue until equal federal marriage rights are granted to same-sex couples. The challenge, at this early stage, has been how to spread the word and get others to join me in this fight. 
How exactly do I get the attention of people and explain to them that refusing to attend marriages, as long as they remain segregated institutions, will go a long way in bringing about change? How do I convince people to stop buying wedding presents? How exactly do I, and all those involved in The Marrying Kind, chip away at the profits of the wedding economy and become Williams-Sonoma’s worst nightmare?
My web designer, Ping Fang suggested I start a group on Facebook to bring attention to the boycott. I’d been invited in the past to join Facebook, but never really saw the point of spending time online with friends when it seems hard enough to find time to spend with friends in real life.
As I began exploring Facebook, I stumbled upon groups called I love cheese (and I love bacon). There was one called Close your Damn Legs, directed at subway riders who hog seats. These groups, and countless others, each have thousands of members. Amazing.
Millions of people support marriage equality, so I was convinced my group would attract vast numbers on Facebook. The Marrying Kind group offers positive action steps to achieve that goal. Soon, I was sure, The Marrying Kind would be bigger than I Love Cheese. After all, I reasoned Facebook must be filled with people who are lactose intolerant or saturated-fat phobic, or just don’t like the taste. How many of its members really want to see gays and lesbians marginalized and disenfranchised?
So I joined Facebook, formed the group and invited fifty or so friends and then I waited. For days it was a group of two: myself and my amazing web designer, Ping Fang. Soon after, my oldest and dearest friend, Alison joined. Within five days we were twenty.
A week later we reached twenty-three members.  Even though I hadn’t done very much to actively solicit members, despair was setting in.  I could not bring myself to check what I was convinced would be the rapidly growing membership of I love cheese. (Could they have reached one million?)  Disgusted by the swarms of cheddar-lovers, I decided to eliminate dairy from my diet. Also, I briefly toyed with the idea of starting a group called, I loathe cheese. I abandoned that notion as being a time waste which would do nothing to bring about gay marriage rights.
My morning routine became log onto Facebook, confirm that the group remained a static twenty-three. Then I’d make coffee (fortunately, what with my dairy ban, I drink it black).
Miraculously, one morning while checking on The Marrying Kind group, I saw that we had jumped to twenty-eight members. My friends were coming through for me! Those thirty or so friends of mine who had ignored my invitation finally were having a change of heart. They were joining.
But no.  These five new members were not friends of mine, nor did we have friends in common. The new members were all students or alumni from Kent State. Kent State? How did that happen?
Here’s how: I received a note and a “friend request” from a woman named Marta Roueiheb. She had come upon the group while searching facebook and immediately responded to my call to action. She told me that she’s been with her boyfriend, Jason Byard, for six years, but long ago they decided they would not wed until gay marriage was legalized. She and Jason joined The Marrying Kind. Marta invited over one hundred of her friends.
I was amazed and excited and unbelievably moved that a couple who can legally marry have chosen not to until I can get married too.
Within two days, our membership had passed forty– still a small group. But considering half of the members are friends of one straight couple I’ve never met, who live in a state I’ve never visited, it’s truly exciting.
I imagine other Marta and Jason’s — all over the country, at every university– finding the website or this blog or the Facebook group, and being similarly moved. These people will join. They will tell their friends. They will invite others. And like the old shampoo ad– And So On, And So On, And So On…
I know college years are about, among other things, school rivalries. Surly no university wants to be out done by Kent State on the issue of supporting justice. From Harvard to Berkley, I ask others to follow the lead of Marta, Jason and their friends at Kent State.
Tomorrow, when I wake, who knows. Maybe I’ll have a new Friend from Yale.
Please hurry, equality is at stake.  Also, I’d love to eat a piece of cheese.
By Ken O'Neill • Posted in Uncategorized • No Comment
August 27th, 2008

California, here I come?

Now gay marriage is legal in California. And, though New York state does not have gay marriage, our governor, David Patterson has announced that out of state ceremonies will be recognized by the state.  Massachusetts, realizing how much revenue they stood to lose by not performing weddings for out-of-state gay couples, quickly changed their laws. And now they’re more than happy to take all the queer cash that will come flooding into the state.
And so, gay and lesbian couples who live in New York state can now easily wed, in two of our fifty states. But should they? 
If you want to declare your love for each other in a formal way in front of your family and friends, by all means you should. As focused as I am on the rights associated with marriage, I understand there are couples who strongly desire the spiritual bond that comes with that ritual.
If one of the two members of the couple works for New York state and has a pension (like a firefighter, for example) probably you should get married tomorrow to secure the pension for your spouse. 
If, for you, getting married is its own form of protest, hurry up and tie the knot.
If, however, after getting the license and having the ceremony you are expecting to have your relationship recognized by the United States of America, you’re going to have to wait to get married.
I was saddened to read that when next we take our U.S. survey, gay & lesbian couples who have legally wed in CA, MA or Canada and who check the box “Married” when filling their forms, will have the answer changed to living together/partnered. The reason being that, because of DOMA, checking the married box is a lie in the eyes of our government. No matter what you say, Uncle Sam says, “No way. Sorry. You aren’t married.”
We have no money for health care, education or the arts in this country, but, apparently, we do have enough money to pay some guy to cross out married and write in partnered on census forms. That’s someone’s job!
So when people ask me why I’m boycotting weddings when I can so easily get married in California, I explain how thrilled I am that California has taken this step toward equality. How delighted I am for the couples who have chosen to wed. And I tell them that, for my partner and me, it’s not enough. We want all the rights and recognitions afforded straight couples. Assuming the federal government doesn’t burn through all of social security paying the census guys to re-write the forms of homos, I’d like to know my partner and I will receive each other’s benefits, inherit each other’s estates without being taxed and the 1300 other things we’re denied as a gay couple. 
Perhaps marriage shouldn’t be about money. But the fact is that denying gays federal marriage is a very effective way to keeps us, as a group, economically disadvantaged. And money and progress go together. When African American’s stopped getting on the bus, things began to change.
Just as Massachusetts began allowing out-of-state gays to wed when they realized how much money they were going to lose to California, pressure on the federal government to recognize same-sex marriage will come from the one hundred billion dollar wedding industry when they realize that five or ten or twenty percent of their income has stopped because people of conscience have ceased participating the marriage economy.
When federal law changes, who knows, California might be a lovely spot for a ceremony.
By Ken O'Neill • Posted in Uncategorized • No Comment
August 21st, 2008

Both Sending and feeling regrets

I can’t begin to tell you what a snap it is to skip weddings when no one’s inviting you to any. 

How I thought about the day when an invitation would finally come. It would be from my father’s third cousin-once removed, who, though present at my christening, had been absent from my life since.  Sorry, no can do, I’d write on my response card. I‘m Gay, I don’t attend weddings. And then, after having taken the moral high ground with a complete stranger I could forget about this political position of mine.
And then the day arrived when an invitation came–not from my hoped for stranger. But from one of my closest friends. I’ll call her Davy, since that’s her real name. Davy’s not my oldest friend, but she was one of the first people that my partner, Marcus, and I met together. She was the first friend to be given the label “Our Friend”. And now “Our Friend” was getting married.
“Maybe we should make an exception.” Marcus said it, though I was thinking it as well. But there was no need to make an exception. Davy was aware of our stance before she even had a boyfriend. This was all going to be fine.
Except then suddenly it wasn’t. 
We kept suggesting that maybe we’d come. If not to the wedding, well… We briefly toyed with a let’s-just-go-to-the-rehearsal-dinner loophole. We were wishy-washy and filled with doubts. Because, after all, what is the impact of a two person wedding boycott? And this person whose event we’re boycotting is a beloved, she is not a third cousin (once removed).
And so we stalled. We stammered. We avoided. And then one night over dinner I just blurted out, “We’re not coming.” It was a horribly awkward moment, but Davy assured us she understood.
A week or so later, Marcus and I hosted a screening of our (she used to be just mine when I was single) friend, Jennifer Westfeldt’s film Ira and Abby.  In the film, the characters marry and divorce multiple times. After the movie was over, Davy asked me how I could be so supportive of a film about marriage. She was clearly hurt. I had no idea what to say. I worried our friendship would be irreparably damaged.
In the weeks that followed we had several talks. I tried to explain what I was trying to accomplish by not going. This was difficult, because I wasn’t really sure what I wanted to accomplish. I just knew the ache I felt inside. My own longing to be wed. My desire for change.
The week of the wedding Davy said she was having a pre-wedding, pre-rehearsal, cocktail party. Davy was originally from LA and she was marrying a French man, so there were lots of out-of-towners in Manhattan. As a result she was hosting events all week long.
We decided to go for drinks. It wasn’t the wedding. But it was a way to be supportive. When we arrived, Davy hugged me, we both got a little emotional. I knew everything was fine with us. I felt she was really okay with the choice we’d made. I didn’t understand what had caused the shift. But I was relieved.
At the party, I chatted with a woman who I had come to know through Davy. As we parted to move on to other conversations she said, “See you Saturday.”
“No. I won’t be there.”
She laughed. Slapped my arm, playfully. “Yeah, right. See you Saturday.”
As we were about to leave, I saw a woman I did not know pushing her way through the crowd to speak to us. It was Davy’s father’s girlfriend we quickly learned–a television writer and producer from LA. She introduced herself and said, “I just want you to know that I totally support what you’re doing We were all talking about this last night at dinner.  My writing partner is gay. He’s my dear friend. We bought burial plots together, that’s how close we are…”
She said more lovely things, but I can’t recall them because I kept thinking it’s the first family dinner of the wedding week and every one is talking about two gay guys not going to the wedding. I imagined the various opinions–pro and con. And in an instant I knew I had made the right choice.
All this conversation took place. This debating. This anger. This understanding. All of this thought was happening about this subject, because I wasn’t going. None of it would have happened if I’d just gone.
Later I learned from mutual friends who had been there, that the conversation continued at the reception. As more friends inquired as to our absence. 
I believe those conversations are vital. And I believe they only happen when with all respect I very sadly send my regrets.
By Ken O'Neill • Posted in Uncategorized • No Comment
August 5th, 2008

How this all began

I am the most reluctant of activists. My high school photo was not actually captioned ‘Least Likely to Start a Movement’. But that’s only because it had no caption at all. I wasn’t really a joiner. Or a ring leader. Not a trouble maker. I was a go-with-the-flow guy.

But something happened to me. Slowly. Over time. I’d have a discontented feeling that I’d squash. An unpopular opinion I would not share. And then, all at once I could no longer do what was expected of me. I had to voice my dissent. 
And this moment came while watching Oprah. 
And not one of those Oprah young girls sold into prostitution shows. No. It was a sweet, fantasy wedding episode. I watched a beautiful wedding ceremony. And as I watched, I began to cry. First just a few tears. Then I began to wail violently. I couldn’t catch my breath. I’ve never had a nervous breakdown. But it occurred to me that my exaggerated response to the televised nuptials of complete strangers might in fact  constitute some kind of emotional collapse. I wept straight through the commercial break.
When the show resumed, Oprah was back in her studio sitting with the wedding planner. To me, he seemed pretty gay. And all at once, I understood my tears. I was watching an event that I felt that I, as a gay man, would never be allowed to have. I wondered how conflicting it must be for that wedding planner to dedicate his life to creating events he was forbidden by Federal law from participating in. Then I thought about the whole wedding industry. the florists, organists, dress designers, cater-waiters. What would happen if gay people stopped working in the wedding industry? Straight people wouldn’t be able to get married.
Well, of course they would. But the events wouldn’t be nearly as fabulous.
Around this time I had attended four weddings in three months. One a gay couple in Holland, was unbelievable. Two gay men legally wed. The other three were straight couples in the USA. These three ceremonies were rough for me. I was happy for my American friends. But the events themselves were really painful. I attended with my partner. We had been together  longer than any of these married couples had been together. I kept wondering if any of the newlyweds would give us special thanks for attending what was obviously a difficult event. Some special praise for attending the segregated event that bans us.  But no thanks were offered.
Soon after, we decided to stop attending weddings and we don’t give gifts. I refuse to participate in the wedding economy in anyway until all Americans have equal federal marriage rights. My partner and I are encouraging everyone to join us.  
I’ll be back soon to write about what happened the first time we declined a wedding invitation for moral reasons.
By Ken O'Neill • Posted in Uncategorized • No Comment